Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

OMD NewsOMD News

Crime

Southern California Woman Faces Stricter Charges as Prop 36 Is Now in Effect


WPBN: A person who has a history of theft convictions and is suspected of shoplifting is presently being investigated for potential criminal charges. This comes after California’s Proposition 36 was recently put into effect, as authorities verified last week.

The incident happened at the Ulta Beauty store in Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is situated on the 12000 block of Foothill Boulevard. On Monday, deputies from the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department received a call about an ongoing theft occurring on the property.

Following the incident, the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department issued a statement stating that the suspect, who was later identified as San Bernardino resident Angelina Herrera, was “inside the store concealing items in a backpack.”

When deputies eventually got in touch with Herrera, they found that she was carrying stolen goods from the store. After this discovery, Herrera was taken into custody and later checked into the West Valley Detention Center. According to the authorities, she has “an extensive criminal history, including convictions for prior thefts.”

The Homelessness, Drug Addiction, and Theft Reduction Act, or Proposition 36, amends the California Penal and Health and Safety Codes in a number of ways. while the situation calls for it, these revisions give law enforcement officials more resources and legal protections to employ while making an arrest.

These additional charges, according to the Sheriff’s Department, have the ability to keep offenders from being released on citation before their court appearance in addition to allowing for enhanced sentence.

Herrera was taken into custody on suspicion of breaking Penal Code 666.1, which allows shoplifting to be prosecuted as a felony or a misdemeanor in California. Regardless of the alleged theft’s monetary worth, this is applicable if the accused has two or more prior convictions relating to theft. Due to her lengthy criminal record and prior theft offenses, Herrera was imprisoned on suspicion of breaking this particular clause.

There could be serious repercussions if Herrera is found guilty of this crime. A repeat offender may be imprisoned in a county jail for up to a year under Penal Code 666.1.

Judge Slams Mother for Abandoning Newborn ‘Wearing Only a Diaper’ on Christmas Day

The impact of Proposition 36, which was passed to address problems with drug addiction, homelessness, and recurrent stealing offenses, is demonstrated by this instance.

The proposal seeks to give the legal system and law enforcement more stringent tools to combat and discourage criminal activity, especially for those who have a history of committing the same crimes.

The new law aims to guarantee that offenders get just punishment for their conduct while lowering the chance of recidivism by limiting citation-based releases and establishing enhanced sentencing options.

Get Ready: New Oregon Laws Set to Take Effect on January 1, 2025

Herrera’s case is still under investigation, and as the case moves forward, investigators anticipate providing more information.

More Coverage:

REFERENCE



Source link

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Finance

There is finally an update on 4th stimulus check for Social Security Recipients! Individuals who receive Social Security benefits can expect to receive a...

Military

The attack using 14 military choppers that Russian President Vladimir Putin planned was destroyed by Ukraine using US-supplied long-range tactical missiles. Russian President Vladimir...

Finance

The Biden administration has announced recently that it plans to increase the monthly payments of seniors and veterans to $2,000. $2,000 in Monthly Payments...

Finance

In Texas, this September the SNAP payments will end, worth up to $1,691, on Friday. The household income determines eligibility. A single-person household must earn more than...