House Oversight and Judiciary Committees Seek Information on President Biden’s Alleged Involvement in Son’s Subpoena Disobedience
House Republican leaders have escalated their scrutiny of President Biden’s alleged involvement in his son’s defiance of a congressional subpoena. Reps. James Comer and Jim Jordan of the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees have formally requested White House documents related to Hunter Biden’s decision not to comply with the subpoena for a deposition. The move comes as part of an expanding impeachment inquiry into President Biden.
The Republican leaders have specifically asked for communications between White House staff and Hunter Biden or his lawyers regarding his scheduled deposition. This request follows Hunter Biden’s refusal to comply with the Oversight Committee’s subpoena for a closed-door interview. The demand for documents seeks to shed light on any potential advanced knowledge or involvement of the President in his son’s decision.
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre’s statement that the President was “familiar with” what his son was going to say in his statement has heightened the Republican leaders’ determination to examine the President’s alleged role in his son’s disobedience of the subpoenas. The letter to White House counsel Edward Siskel sets a Jan. 10 deadline for the White House to provide the requested records.
READ ALSO: Former Prosecutor Lesley Wolf Under Scrutiny For Actions In Hunter Biden Investigation
Amid these developments, the House Republicans are also aiming to obtain documents from the Executive Office of the President staff related to a comment made by President Biden in December. Their request reflects the intensifying focus on the President’s potential involvement in his son’s refusal to comply with the subpoena for testimony.
The quest for these documents marks a significant step in the Republican-led impeachment inquiry into President Biden. The demand for information reveals the growing scrutiny on the President concerning his son’s actions and the potential repercussions of his alleged advanced knowledge of the situation.