Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

OMD NewsOMD News


Republicans Launch Investigation Into Alleged Affair Between Georgia DA’s Attorney and Trump Prosecutor, Nathan Wade

Photo from Washington Post

House Republicans have initiated an inquiry into the conduct of attorney Nathan Wade, hired by Georgia DA Fani Willis for the prosecution of Donald Trump, amid accusations of an extramarital affair and financial impropriety. The Judiciary Committee has issued a letter to Wade, requesting documents related to his work on the Trump indictment, highlighting concerns over his qualifications, the substantial fees billed, and potential conflicts of interest arising from his relationship with Willis. The investigation questions whether federal funds were appropriately used, raising implications for both legal and ethical considerations.

Photo from NY Post

Unveiling Allegations and Investigative Focus

The Judiciary Committee’s letter addresses the controversial hiring of Nathan Wade, who, despite lacking experience in felony trials, was paid over $650,000 to lead the investigation into Trump’s alleged election interference. The probe into Wade’s qualifications intensifies as the court filing suggests an intimate relationship predating his appointment, potentially posing conflicts of interest.

The court document alleges that Wade billed “enormous legal fees,” raising questions about the appropriateness of the expenses and whether federal funds were utilized. The investigation delves into Wade’s qualifications, asserting that he did not meet the criteria set by the Fulton County Superior Court for a court-appointed defense lawyer in the Trump case.

Notably, the probe extends beyond Wade’s professional capacity, examining personal ties between him and DA Fani Willis. The letter seeks evidence of their alleged romantic involvement, pointing to shared travels and personal outings. Republicans are scrutinizing the possible use of taxpayer money for personal affairs and the potential impact on the impartiality of the Trump prosecution.

READ ALSO: Chris Christie’s Withdrawal From GOP Race Boosts Nikki Haley’s Presidential Prospects

Political Fallout and Extended Investigations

This latest development follows earlier revelations that Nathan Wade had meetings at the Biden White House, raising questions about political influence. The Judiciary Committee, already investigating the Fulton County DA, is now expanding its scope to scrutinize potential misuse of federal funds and coordination with the Justice Department.

Accusations of a sealed divorce filing and claims of personal travels between Wade and Willis further complicate the legal landscape. The letter demands communications between Wade and relevant offices, invoices, financial arrangements, and contracts related to the Trump investigation, aiming to shed light on potential improprieties and conflicts of interest.

As the investigation unfolds, the intertwined personal and professional aspects of the case could have far-reaching implications for both the Trump prosecution and the reputations of those involved. The January 26 deadline for document submission adds urgency to a probe that intersects legal, ethical, and political dimensions.

READ ALSO: Ohio House Takes Controversial Stand: Overrides Governor’s Veto On Ban On Gender-Affirming Care For Minors

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like


There is finally an update on 4th stimulus check for Social Security Recipients! Individuals who receive Social Security benefits can expect to receive a...


The attack using 14 military choppers that Russian President Vladimir Putin planned was destroyed by Ukraine using US-supplied long-range tactical missiles. Russian President Vladimir...


The Biden administration has announced recently that it plans to increase the monthly payments of seniors and veterans to $2,000. $2,000 in Monthly Payments...


In Texas, this September the SNAP payments will end, worth up to $1,691, on Friday. The household income determines eligibility. A single-person household must earn more than...